PSIM   Public Services Information Management

 

 

Essay title:  Is public sector information 'neutral' ?

 

Signposts:

 

Ø      Information as encoded messages transmitted through channels from a sender to a receiver

     
http://www.cultsock.ndirect.co.uk/MUHome/cshtml/index.html

      is a classic source of the Shannon and Weaver model.  You may wish to consider some of the basic elements:

      a source; an encoder; a transmitter; a message; a channel; a decoder; a receiver

 

      From the point of view of the social scientist, it is quite useful to think of channels (‘water pipes’) and information as the
      ‘water’.  However, consider the following problems…
       (a) Is what is transmitted what is received ? (Actually? Internalised?  Appreciated)
       (b) What about ‘noise’ in the system (which clutters up the message)

 

Ø      The problem of 'information' when no information is transferred (' the dog not barking in the night' Conan Doyle(?),Silver Blaze in Collected Stories of Sherlock Holmes)

 This an interesting problem – ‘if you don’t hear from me assume that I’m OK because bad news travels fast!’ OR
  ‘management by exception – if you don’t tell me, I assume that everything is all right!’
 This problem depends upon prior expectations being set up which have to be ‘broken’ by a communication that alters the ‘default’  Problems with this, though?

 
 It s generally quite easy to see when a graph shows something – but harder to spot when nothing appears to be happening (e.g. the absence of a difference in the IT scores between male and female IT technicians may say something quite significant about the attainments of female IT technicians!)
 

 

Ø      Organisational power centres structure, collate and organise data

Whenever you look at a graph, table or what have you, think ‘Who applied what mental processes to have the data supplied in this format?  What picture of the universe does it convey? Whose (or what) organisational priorities does it reflect (think about Best Value data, for example, such as ‘truancy rates’)  Data, particularly statistical data, tends to reflect the priorities of the table compiler who unwittingly may be organising the data in a particular way…

 

Ø      The language of communication, including 'shared universes of meaning'

All organisations and work groups will tend to use initials, acronyms and ‘short-hand words’ to facilitate fast and easy communication (e.g. in Hampshire County Council we have HCC,CMT,LGR whilst in King Alfred’s we have KAC,SQC,ASC,PRC etc.)  This can be both daunting and confusing to the newcomer until they ‘learn the lingo’ Understanding, using and communicating using these special languages and codes helps to mark one out as a member of the club.  It is often outsiders who point out the funny side of these aspects e.g. a visitor to the college who remarked about the arrangements for students who had failed assignments ‘only in an Anglican college have I heard of people who have to undertake an exercise in redemption!  These specialised languages, sometimes known as argot when applied to the criminal fraternity help to establish who is ‘one of us’ and who is ‘one of them’.  For this reason, jokes often do not translate well across cultures, concepts have different shades of meaning (e.g. bureaucracy is used almost as a term of abuse in the general public but as a technically neutral term to social scientists etc.)  Linguistic analysis is quite extensively used in the social sciences including the use of content analysis i.e. measuring the frequency of space devoted to particular items  (such as foreign affairs in a newspaper) and the tone of voice used in the description.

 

Ø      The 'how' of communication rather than the what (fonts, tones, colours)

In the same way that body language perhaps betrays our inner feeling states, so too does the way in which we communicate our thoughts.  So  a Times Roman font can be seen as formal (boring to some!), whilst Comic Sans MS can be seen as much more informal (friendlier ?  but too informal?) for  others. We may, therefore convey something about ourselves in the way that we write e.g.
- does a sloppy, disorganised, mis-spelled, inconsistent document send messages about the author ?
- does an overlong, latinate-style, pedantic style do the same
Colours have shared universes of meaning so that red is nearly always seen as a warning and/or aggressive, some blues as cold/impersonal etc.  This can be overdone and differs between cultures e.g. white, not black, is a symbol of mourning in many Asian cultures.

I personally am of the view that how we say things sends off all kinds of messages which can override what we say (e.g. a misplaced comma in it’s can destroy our credibility to some, whereas for others it is seen as nit-picking!

 

Ø      Do all public information providers 'spin'?

There are always two sides to every story and we can always maintain a glass is half-empty rather than being half-full. Given the pressure that public resources have been under for so many years, there may be a natural desire to redress the balance.  Putting ‘news’ into a particular context (e.g. news of regionalism given a context by indicating the MORI poll that showed only lukewarm support) can be seen as ‘spin’ or as particularly effective news management depending upon your point of view.  Spinning is viewed perjoratively as distortion, lying or evasion – but context-setting, putting out a positive message is seen as the essence of modern good PR? Corporate Communications.  How would one determine the boundary between the two?

 

Ø      Lies, damned lies and statistical data

The full quotation is ‘There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics’(Benjamin Disraeli,1804-1881)
And I also like ‘He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamppostsfor  support rather than illumination@ (Andrew Lang, Scottish Author)  There is also the ‘There are two kinds of statistics – the kind that you look up and the kind that you make up’ (which may in Lucy in the Charlie Brown cartoon)

Statistics may be misleading presented (poor axes, inappropriate use of diagrams) and this is poor professional practice.  Statistics may be accurate but incomplete, or out-of-date.

The fact that the Disraeli quote is used so often may reveal that people are (a) slightly unhappy that they are being bamboozled by statistical data (b) a feeling that statistics are quoted inappropriately.

On the other hand, first year social students are often told that they should be quoting statistical data rather than making ‘man in the argument in the pub’ type of wild generalisations.

 

Ø      Media professionals have their own professional agenda

The media are given advance press-briefings of particular events and know what is ‘news-worthy’- every Press Office will have ‘embargoed – not for release before 11.0 am on Monday….’ type press releases.  But it is also possible to predict what can be considered ‘news’ or ‘non-news’ (e.g. ‘Dog bites Man’’ is a non-story but ‘Man bites Dog’ is another matter).  Does the release of stores reveal a metropolitan, middle class view of the world (e.g. story about the court case
in which the buyers successfully sued a vendor for the removal of fixtures/fittings from a house was widely reported – because professionals buy/sell houses more often? It’s a secret nightmare?)  So it is possible to predict what might be considered news-worthy because media professionals share the same ‘world’.

Also of course there are journalistic conventions e.g. what is the angle on this ? line on this? Local interest? Human interest? Etc. Journalists and politicians  have a symbiotic relationship i.e. each needs the other in this.

 

Ø      What exactly counts as the public sector?

This is not quite so easy to define as it used to be but we would now include:
~  central government and its agencies (and also its quangos, including Higher Education)
~  local government (including teachers, social workers, fire, police and emergency)
~ the NHS and Healthcare trusts
and we would exclude
~privatised utilities (gas, water, electricity)
~ what about Rail track (legally? De facto)
Airtraffic control (NATS) is now ‘officially’ in the private sector but might be seen as public sector – but many private businesses (nursing homes?) only exist because they are funded exclusively by the State (directly or indirectly)

We can measure by using (a) proportion of Gross Domestic Product or buy (b)numbers (fulltime equivalent, not headcounts) employed.  Trying to discern that is/is not public sector often a confusing matter.  In the past, some utilities were constantly transferred from one side of the divide to another (British Steel, British Road Services),Thomas Cook etc.

 

 

 

Ø      Clarity v. Mixed signals

It is possible that a single message can be confused or negated by a ‘mixed signal’  Politicians may try to give missed signals to keep all of their options open for when the political wind/climate changes (‘I’ve been saying since 1987 that…’) Corporate Communications tries to ensure that ‘everybody is singing from the same hymn sheet’ (but even in this metaphor there are different voices, languages, emphasis that reflect different positions and perspectives.

Note Mandy Rice-Davis in the Profumo scandal ‘Well, he would say that wouldn’t he’ re. John Profumo scandal in 1963.

 

 

Feel free to include several of the above (7-8) dropping some themes whilst incorporating others.

 

Mike Hart

Web Space provided by Hampshire County Council